Green Action Challenge 2026: Social Outcomes Report and Film
소식

Green Action Challenge 2026: Social Outcomes Report and Film

Linked to World Cleanup Day, 44 participants logged 139 sessions and recorded 11,172 items. The report, value indicators and film are published here.

이타서울

These are the results of Green Action Challenge 2026, run by the Korea Youth Work Agency (National Award Operator of The Duke of Edinburgh's International Award in Korea) and ITASEOUL, linked to World Cleanup Day 2026. This post brings together the film, the Social Outcomes Report and the social and environmental value indicators.

한국어판

Film

Social Outcomes Report

Abstract

Figure 1. Campaign results at a glance

This report sets out the social outcomes of Green Action Challenge 2026, run by the Korea Youth Work Agency and ITASEOUL in connection with World Cleanup Day 2026 (Figure 1). During the campaign period (1 September to 31 October 2026, with sessions counted if they started on or after 7 September), 108 people registered. Of these, 44 took part in 139 plogging (litter-picking while walking) sessions, picked up 11,172 items of litter and recorded the location, time and type of each. The people who recorded data include some adults, such as Award Leaders. The social outcome of this campaign is that participants recorded local environmental problems and that those records remain as material explaining what was collected at the places of activity.

Confirmed from the recordsNot measured
29 of the 44 participants who recorded data (65.9%) logged 2 or more sessionsChanges in participants' skills, attitudes and behaviour
Cigarette butts made up 49.5% of items collectedOutcomes for young people alone (some adults are included)
The top 10% of 100 m grid squares held 47.7% of items collectedThe total amount of litter in an area, and any reduction
99 grid squares were recorded on 2 or more different daysWhether the conversions represent actual savings

※ Keywords: World Cleanup Day, The Duke of Edinburgh's International Award, data plogging, youth environmental citizenship, social value

1. Background and Purpose

World Cleanup Day is a civic action in which people around the world clear litter together, held each year around 20 September. In South Korea many one-off clean-up events take place at this time, but where the litter came from and whether the same place becomes littered again are in some cases not recorded. The Voluntary Service section of The Duke of Edinburgh's International Award names environmental service as a type of activity. In South Korea the Korea Youth Work Agency serves as the National Award Operator.

Green Action Challenge 2026 was planned to connect these two contexts. Each time participants picked up litter, they selected its type and left its location in the ITA City data plogging app, and the records were used in Award Centre reports as material for examining local problems. This report sets out the results under four headings (participation, persistence, environment and use of data) and also presents the range and limits of what can be converted into quantified social value.

2. Data and Method

The population is participants who were issued a participant number or who joined an Award Centre group, and the analysis covers the records of the 44 who logged at least one session. The Award Centres with activity records are SALT International School (Seongnam, Gyeonggi), Geochang Heungsadan (Geochang, Gyeongnam), Daegu Metropolitan Youth Training Centre (Daegu), Yeonhui Youth Centre (Incheon) and Wondangsan Youth Culture House (Gwangju). Individual Award participants in Hwacheon, Gangwon, were also active. The data are the ITA City session records and collection point records. Participation and persistence indicators were mapped to the Outcomes (§1.5) and Impacts (§1.6) set out in The Duke of Edinburgh's International Award Foundation's International Handbook for Award Leaders 2024. Details of the counting rules and formulas are given in Appendix B.

3. Results

3.1 Scale of participation

Of the 108 people registered, 44 (40.7%) left activity records. An international school, a youth organisation, youth training facilities and individual participants all recorded in the same way, and activity covered 9 regions and 18 districts (Figure 2, Figure 3). Figures for citation are collected in Appendix A.

Figure 2. Items collected by district

※ Source: ITA City collection point records. Each circle is placed at the average of the recorded locations in the district. Beach records are included.

Figure 3. Activity photos posted on ITA City by participants

※ Photos posted by participants. Faces have been obscured.

3.2 Persistence indicators

The Award values sustained activity over one-off participation (the guiding principle of being Persistent). Of the 44 participants who recorded data, 29 (65.9%) logged 2 or more sessions, 24 were active over 2 or more weeks and 10 over 4 or more weeks (Figure 4). Time per person had a median of 0.75 hours and a mean of 1.13 hours. Sessions by week, day and time of day are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. Because the recording period was 8 weeks and the mean time per person was 1.13 hours, this campaign alone does not meet the Bronze requirement for the Voluntary Service section (at least 13 weeks, averaging 1 hour a week). Whether it counts as part of Voluntary Service section activity is for the Award Leader to decide.

Figure 4. 29 of the 44 participants who recorded data logged 2 or more sessions

※ Source: ITA City session records. Values other than registration are based on the 44 participants with activity records.

Figure 5. Sessions and items collected by week

※ The horizontal axis shows the date (month/day) of the Monday of each week. The week of 9/21 includes the Chuseok holiday. The values may reflect Award Centre schedules and do not indicate a rising trend.

Figure 6. Sessions by day of week and time of day

※ Based on session start time. Colour uses a log scale. The 28 sessions at 16:00 on Wednesdays combine 6 dates, and the busiest date was 9 September with 6. The values reflect group schedules and do not indicate a tendency for that day of the week.

3.3 Item composition and concentration of collection

By composition, cigarette butts numbered 5,533 items, including 96 on beaches, and made up 49.5% of items collected. Estimated from the average weight of each type in land records, cigarette butts come to 1.7 kg, 0.5% of total estimated weight (Figure 7). Reporting of collection by weight does not reveal the type collected most often. Recording count and location together makes such a type visible. Cigarette filters are made of cellulose acetate (a type of plastic). If cigarette butts are classed as plastic-type items along with plastic film, plastics, PET and polystyrene, they account for 8,500 (77.6%) of the 10,949 items collected on land.

Figure 7. Cigarette butts are 49.7% by count but 0.5% by estimated weight

※ Based on the 10,949 items collected on land, so cigarette butts are 5,437 items, 49.7%. The 5,533 items, 49.5% in the text are based on all 11,172 items, including 223 on beaches (96 cigarette butts). Weights are estimates calculated from the average weight of each type in land records (total 348.4 kg).

Of the 263 recorded 100 m grid squares, the top 10% (27 squares) held 47.7% of all items collected. There are 99 grid squares recorded on 2 or more different days and 51 recorded on 3 or more (Figure 8). These repeat observations can serve as reference points for comparing change at the same places in the next round.

Figure 8. The top 10% of grid squares held 47.7% of items collected

※ Values are limited to places where participants were active and are not the total amount of litter in an area.

3.4 Local inquiry cases

The location records showed where large amounts of litter were collected. In Dochon-dong, Seongnam, 1,252 items were collected in ten 100 m grid squares, 71% of them cigarette butts. This area was cleaned repeatedly on 9 different days, and litter was recorded again after cleaning.

In Geochang, school no-smoking zones (30 m from the school boundary) were compared with collection locations. In area A of the Geochang Heungsadan Award Centre report, 81 of 116 cigarette butts were collected 30–60 m from a school boundary, just outside the no-smoking zone (Figure 9). Around all 10 schools, the 30–60 m band also had the most butts, at 372 (Figure 10). Separately, on a back lane in area A, 82 cigarette butts were collected on 9 September, and 81 were recorded again on the same lane 4 weeks later, on 7 October.

Figure 9. No-smoking zone and collection locations (concept diagram)

※ A concept diagram for explanation. The scale and the positions of the dots differ from reality.

Figure 10. Geochang cigarette butts by distance, and one back lane observed again

※ Values are not adjusted for the area of each distance band or for the routes walked. The two back lane values come from different survey conditions and are not interpreted as improvement or deterioration. Sources: Geochang Heungsadan records, comparison with school boundaries, Award Centre newsletter.

These results were set out in Award Centre reports as inquiry questions such as "What should be in place where the no-smoking zone ends?". Such questions correspond to Planning and problem solving (Outcome 5) and Civic competence (Outcome 9) in the Foundation's outcomes framework. However, the analysis was carried out by ITASEOUL from participants' records, and improvement proposals arising from the questions have not yet been passed to local institutions or implemented.

3.5 Indicative conversions

Values converted with the ITA City standard formula are indicative figures for gauging scale and are not achievements (Figure 11, Table 1). Volunteer time has a clear reference rate and can be converted into money. Applying the 2026 minimum hourly wage of KRW 10,320 (Ministry of Employment and Labor Notice 2025-47) to the 49.9 hours recorded in the app (the 50.0 hours in Appendix A is a sum of rounded per-person figures) gives about KRW 515,000. This value includes the time of adults such as Award Leaders and may differ from actual volunteer person-hours, so it should be read as an indicative figure that cannot be taken as the value of young people's volunteering.

Figure 11. Scale of the indicative conversions

※ All are indicative values, not actual savings or reduction achievements. They come from the same records and are not added together. The 496 PET bottles express an amount of carbon and are not a count of items collected.

Table 1. ITA City standard conversions (reference)

IndicatorValueFormula
Plastic kept out of rivers and the sea88.7 kgSum of estimated weights of cans, polystyrene, PET, plastic film, plastics and cigarette butts
Drain-cleaning budget equivalentAbout KRW 3.95 million
(232 storm drains)
Each item treated as 25 cm² of accumulated area, converted to a number of storm drains (315 × 375 mm), about KRW 17,000 per drain
Public health area43,796 m²4 m² per item. Equal to the area of 219 playgrounds (200 m²)
Carbon saving from recycling28.2 kgCO2eCan and PET recycling factors × 90.1% volunteer separation rate

※ The 223 items collected on beaches are excluded from the calculation. The drain budget is based on average drain-cleaning budget data from Seoul City and the Ministry of Public Safety (2013 to 2019), and the separation rate on survey data from the Korea Central Volunteer Center (December 2022). The carbon saving holds only if the collected cans and PET bottles were separated for recycling.

3.6 Use of data

Each of the 11,172 collection records holds a location, time and type. These records were used for Award Centre maps, analysis of distance from school no-smoking zones and locating where collection was concentrated, and records in the same format can be compared with the next round. Participants' voluntary service remains both as their individual activity record and as a record explaining what was collected at the places of activity (Figure 12).

Figure 12. Stages from records to questions

※ Dashed boxes mark a stage not yet carried out.

4. Discussion

4.1 Interpreting the social outcomes

The social outcomes of this campaign can be set out under three points. First, participants observed and recorded local environmental problems alongside the clean-up. That many cigarette butts in area A of Geochang were collected just outside the no-smoking zone boundary does not appear in total item counts and was identified from records that kept location. Second, because an international school, a youth organisation, youth training facilities and individual participants left data in the same format, records from different areas were brought into one system. Third, repeat observations have accumulated, so change at the same places can be compared in the next round.

4.2 Mapping to the Foundation's outcomes framework

Table 2 maps this round's records to the Foundation's items. The activity records correspond to "Increased engagement with charitable and community causes", which the Foundation defines as an impact. For "Improved environmental impact" there are collection records only, with no records of behaviour change. The Foundation's Global Social Value Report 2024 does not monetise the environmental area, and the conversions in this report are likewise not inputs to the Foundation's formula.

Table 2. This round's records by Foundation item (change was not measured for any item)

Foundation itemContentCategoryThis round's records
Impact 4Engagement with charitable and community causes● Participation recordActivity records of 44 participants, 139 sessions, 50.0 hours
Outcome 2Resilience and determination● Participation recordRepeat records of the 29 participants with 2 or more sessions
Impact 5Improved environmental impact◐ Indirect recordCollection records only, no records of behaviour change
Outcome 5Planning and problem solving◐ Indirect record2 inquiry cases (Seongnam, Geochang), analysis carried out by ITASEOUL
Outcome 9Civic competence◐ Indirect recordInquiry questions in reports, nothing passed to institutions
Outcome 1Confidence○ No recordPre/post questions next round
Outcome 8Personal and social wellbeing○ No recordPre/post questions next round

4.3 Limitations

  • The 44 participants who recorded data include some adults and age information is mostly missing, so outcomes for young people alone could not be separated.
  • Changes in participants' attitudes, behaviour and skills could not be confirmed because no pre/post measurement was carried out. The persistence indicators in this report are records of participation behaviour and are not evidence of change in skills.
  • Item counts and weights show what participants picked up and do not indicate the total amount of litter or the level of pollution in an area. Weights are estimates calculated from the average weight of each type.
  • The conversions in Table 1 are indicative figures for gauging scale. The drain-cleaning budget figure is not a budget actually saved, and the carbon saving holds only if the collected cans and PET bottles were separated for recycling.
  • Repeat observations of the same place were made under different survey conditions (time, weather, number of people), so changes in counts were not interpreted as an effect of improvement.

5. Conclusions and Recommendations

Three points were confirmed from the records of Green Action Challenge 2026. Cigarette butts in area A of Geochang were collected in large numbers just outside the no-smoking zone boundary, collection was concentrated in a small number of places, and some areas were recorded again over several days. These results were set out as inquiry questions in Award Centre reports. The social outcome of this campaign is that participants' voluntary service remains as a record explaining what was collected at the places of activity. We propose that the items in Table 3 be designed together for the next round.

Table 3. Recommendations for the next round

WhatMethodWhen
Confirm young people's volunteer person-hoursCollect age and youth status at application and link to volunteer hours certified on 1365, Korea's national volunteering portalAt application
Measure change against the Foundation's outcomes framework3 to 5 pre/post self-report questions on confidence, civic competence and environmental behaviourStart and end
Trends in change at the same placesResurvey the repeat-observation grid squares and no-smoking zone boundary sections identified this round under the same conditionsDuring the campaign
Passing proposals to local institutionsPass improvement proposals written by young people themselves to local institutions and record whether they are taken upAfter the campaign

References

  • The Duke of Edinburgh's International Award Foundation (2024). International Handbook for Award Leaders 2024.
  • The Duke of Edinburgh's International Award Foundation (2024). Global Social Value Report 2024.
  • Ministry of Employment and Labor (2025). Notice of the Minimum Wage Applicable in 2026 (Notice 2025-47).
  • ITASEOUL (2022, 2023). Calculation sheets for the Korea Central Volunteer Center's indicators of contribution to reducing environmental load.
  • ITASEOUL (2026). Green Action Challenge 2026 Operating Report and Award Centre reports (SALT International School, Geochang Heungsadan, Daegu Metropolitan Youth Training Centre).
  • Korea Central Volunteer Center (2022). Survey data (December 2022). Cited from the ITASEOUL calculation sheets.

Appendix A. Figures for Citation

IndicatorValueBasis
Registered10852 with a participant number, 56 who joined only an Award Centre group without a participant number
Participants who recorded data44At least one session. Includes some adults
Sessions139Excludes 31 test entries and entries from staff accounts
Items collected11,172Includes 223 on beaches
Time and distance50.0 h, 75.3 kmLogged by the app. May differ from actual volunteer person-hours
Area covered9 regions, 18 districtsBy recorded location
2 or more sessions29 (65.9%)Based on the 44 participants who recorded data. 24 over 2 or more weeks, 10 over 4 or more weeks
Time per personMedian 0.75 h, mean 1.13 hBased on the 44 participants who recorded data
Cigarette butts5,533 items, 49.5%Based on all 11,172 items (5,437 of the 10,949 items on land, 49.7%). Estimated weight 1.7 kg, 0.5% (land basis)
Plastic-type items8,500 items, 77.6%Based on the 10,949 items on land. Estimated weight 85.6 kg
Estimated weight348.4 kgItem count × average weight of each type. Not weighed. Beach items excluded
Concentration of collection47.7% in the top 27 squaresBased on 263 100 m grid squares
Grid squares observed again99 (51 on 3 or more days)Recorded on different days
Volunteer time conversionAbout KRW 515,00049.9 hours × minimum wage of KRW 10,320. Includes adults' time. Indicative figure

Appendix B. Counting Rules

The data are as of 1 November 2026, and activity records cover sessions started on or after 7 September, the date the campaign website went public. Records from staff accounts were excluded, as were 31 records treated as app test entries because one item or fewer was picked up. Items collected is the sum of items participants logged one by one by type. Time and distance are the values recorded by the app, and where several people shared one record they may differ from actual volunteer person-hours (people × time). Participants' ages were mostly not entered and those who recorded data include some adults such as Award Leaders, so the share of young people was not calculated.

Environmental indicators centre on values drawn directly from location and type records (item composition, concentration of collection and repeat observation). A 100 m grid square measures 0.0009 degrees of latitude by 0.00113 degrees of longitude. Quantified conversions apply the standard environmental impact formula of the ITA City platform, which grew out of the calculation of indicators of contribution to reducing environmental load that ITASEOUL has carried out for the Korea Central Volunteer Center since 2022.

Social and environmental value indicators

Green Action Challenge 2026: Social and Environmental Value Indicators

Korea Youth Work Agency (The Duke of Edinburgh's International Award – Korea) × ITASEOUL | Campaign 1 September to 31 October 2026 (sessions counted from 7 September) | Data as of 1 November 2026 | Prepared 5 November 2026 by ITASEOUL
Green Action Challenge 2026 was delivered by the Korea Youth Work Agency (KYWA), the National Award Operator for South Korea, in partnership with ITASEOUL, as part of World Cleanup Day. In total, 44 participants logged 139 plogging (litter-picking while walking) sessions (50.0 hours) as environmental service, recording 11,172 items, each with its location, time and type. This paper sets out the participation and environmental indicators that can be drawn directly from those records, maps them to the Award's outcomes and impacts, and states which of these indicators can be quantified. Changes in participants' attitudes, behaviour and wellbeing were not measured in this round.

1. Activity (measured from app records)

IndicatorValueBasis
Registered10852 with a participant number, 56 who joined through an Award Centre group
Participants who recorded data44At least one session. Includes some adults such as Award Leaders; age was mostly not entered, so the share of young people is not reported
Sessions139Excludes 31 test entries (one item or fewer) and entries from staff accounts
Items picked up and recorded11,172Sum of items logged one by one by type (includes 223 on beaches)
Time and distance50.0 h, 75.3 kmTime and route length logged by the app. Where several people shared one session, these figures differ from volunteer person-hours
Area covered9 regions, 18 districtsBy recorded location: 9 provinces and metropolitan cities; 18 cities, counties and districts

2. Participation and personal development (Award framework)

Award outcome or impactEvidence from this roundTo add next round
Impact 4: Increased engagement with charitable and community causes44 participants, 139 sessions, 50.0 hours. Median time per person 0.75 h, mean 1.13 hConfirm person-hours against certified hours on 1365, Korea's national volunteering portal
Outcome 2: Resilience and determination; guiding principle: Persistent29 participants (65.9%) recorded two or more sessions; 24 were active in two or more weeks; 10 in four or more weeksReturn rate in the next campaign
Outcome 5: Planning and problem solvingTwo cases where records showed where litter gathers. Seongnam (Dochon-dong): 1,252 items in ten 100 m grid squares, 71% cigarette butts. Geochang (area A): 81 of 116 butts lay 30–60 m from a school boundary, just outside the no-smoking zone (Award Centre report). The analysis was carried out by ITASEOUL from participants' recordsHot spots identified by young people themselves; analysis written by them
Outcome 9: Civic competenceAward Centre reports include questions raised by the records (e.g. "What should be in place where the no-smoking zone ends?"). Whether these will be passed to local authorities has not yet been decidedProposals written by young people, local authorities reached, uptake
Outcomes 1 and 8: Confidence; personal and social wellbeingNot measuredThree to five pre/post self-report questions
Voluntary Service sectionCan count towards the Voluntary Service section as environmental service. Participants averaged 1.13 hours in total over the campaign, so it contributes to the section rather than completing it (Bronze requires a minimum of 3 months (13 weeks), averaging at least one hour a week)Number of participants who logged it in the Online Record Book

Outcome and impact names follow the International Handbook for Award Leaders 2024, §1.5 and §1.6. In line with the Award's non-competitive principle, no comparisons between individuals or Award Centres are shown.

3. Environmental indicators (from location and item records)

IndicatorValueCaveat
Use of the dataEach of the 11,172 items carries its location, time and type. The records were used for Award Centre maps, distance analysis around school no-smoking zones and locating where litter gathersShare of records with location; number of reports using the records. The same format allows comparison with the next round
Cigarette butts5,533 items, 49.5% of all items; by estimated weight 1.7 kg, 0.5% (land records)Butts are best read by count. Filters are made of cellulose acetate, a type of plastic. The count is 5,437 on land plus 96 on beaches, shown as 50% in the film
Plastic-type items8,500 items, 77.6% of the 10,949 items collected on land (excluding beaches)Includes plastic film, other plastics, PET, polystyrene and cigarette butts
ConcentrationOf 263 recorded 100 m grid squares, the top 10% (27 squares) held 47.7% of all itemsLimited to places where participants were active
Places observed again99 grid squares recorded on two or more different days, 51 on three or more. Separately, a back lane in Geochang had 82 butts on 9 Sep and 81 on 7 Oct (Award Centre newsletter)Conditions differed, so changes in counts are not interpreted as improvement
Estimated weight collected348.4 kg, of which plastic-type 85.6 kgItem count × average unit weight (table below). Not weighed. 223 beach items excluded (no unit weight)
ItemCountkg eachEst. kgItemCountkg eachEst. kg
Cigarette butts5,4370.000311.7Cans2140.01433.1
Plastic film1,8250.00519.3PET bottles2400.01483.6
Paper1,1060.081490.0Polystyrene1270.01972.5
General waste1,0350.1354140.1Glass940.314129.5
Plastics8710.078768.5Beach223--

Weight and carbon factors come from the ITA City plogging impact formula, which grew out of the calculation sheets ITASEOUL prepared for the Korea Central Volunteer Center (2022, 2023); we are still checking individual factors against their original sources. The four standard conversions from the same formula are shown in section 3a.

3a. ITA City standard conversions (reference)

IndicatorValueMethod and caveats
Plastic kept out of rivers and the sea88.7 kg, equal to 17,731 plastic bags (5 g) or 285,983 cigarette filters (310 mg)Estimated weight of cans, polystyrene, PET, plastic film, plastics and cigarette butts. The 85.6 kg in section 3 excludes cans
Drain-cleaning budget equivalentAbout KRW 3.95 million (232 storm drains)Items × 25 cm², divided by a 315 × 375 mm drain grate, × KRW 8 billion per 470,000 drains (about KRW 17,000 per drain, based on Seoul City and Ministry of Public Safety drain-cleaning budget averages, 2013 to 2019). Not an actual saving
Public health area43,796 m², equal to 219 playgrounds (200 m²) or 14.6 school fields (3,000 m²)Each item treated as affecting the hygiene of 4 m² around it
Carbon saving from recycling28.2 kgCO2e, equal to recycling 496 PET bottles (500 ml) or 9,609 plastic straws(214 cans × 0.106 + 240 PET bottles × 0.036) × 90.1% volunteer separation rate (Korea Central Volunteer Center survey, Dec 2022). Applies only if the cans and bottles were separated for recycling

These use the same formula as the figures shown in the ITA City admin and participant screens. The 223 beach items are not included. All are indicative conversions for scale and should not be added together.

4. Which indicators can be quantified?

ItemQuantifiableMethod and conditions
Value of volunteer timeYes (monetary)Volunteer hours × 2026 minimum hourly wage KRW 10,320 (Ministry of Employment and Labor Notice 2025-47). The app's 49.9 hours give about KRW 515,000 (section 1 shows 50.0 as a sum of rounded per-person figures). Includes adults' time, so not the value of young people's volunteering alone; to be recalculated with certified hours
Weight collectedYes (estimate, physical)348.4 kg as in section 3. Not converted to money
Drain-cleaning budget, public health areaIndicative onlyITA City standard conversions in section 3a. Not actual savings, so not added to monetary value
Recycling carbonConditional (physical)Reference value only for cans and bottles confirmed as sorted. Not a certified emissions reduction
Young people's skills and civic competenceNot monetisedReport as counts and shares as in section 2; measure change with pre/post questions next round
Reduction of local litterNot yetCan be shown as a trend once repeated records at the same places accumulate

All values derive from the same 11,172 records and should not be added together.

Notes for reporting
- Counts and weights show what participants picked up, not the total amount of litter or the level of pollution in an area.
- These indicators record participation. They are not evidence that young people's skills or civic competence changed; change will be measured with pre/post questions next round.
- The Award's 2024 Global Social Value Report does not monetise environmental outcomes. The values here are not inputs to the Award's social value model.

Contact: ITASEOUL (contact@itaseoul.org)

Downloads

#GreenActionChallenge #WorldCleanupDay #DofE #DataPlogging